Discriminatory practices against EU operators highlighted

June 22, 2009 2009

The European Union has urged the United States to open talks on scrapping the ban on foreign online gambling companies.

The Commission has issued a report that finds U.S. laws on Internet gambling are legally not justified and are discriminatory against foreign Internet gambling operators.

The European Commission’s investigation found that US’ laws on remote gambling and their enforcement against EU companies constituted an unacceptable trade barrier that put it in breach of WTO rules.

The European Commission report, instigated by a Trade Barrier Regulation complaint filed by the Remote Gambling Association (RGA), concludes that the treatment of foreign Internet gambling operators by the U.S. under existing domestic law constitutes a barrier to market access for European companies. Further, the report found that the U.S. is in violation of international trade law by threatening and pursuing criminal prosecutions, forfeitures and other enforcement actions against foreign Internet gambling operators, while allowing U.S. online gambling operators, primarily horse betting, to flourish.

Jeffrey Sandman, spokesperson for the Safe and Secure Internet Gambling Initiative, said that the Obama Administration should seek to forge a new direction on Internet gambling, rather than keeping in place a protectionist trade policy that hypocritically discriminates against foreign online gambling operators.

It added that legislation recently introduced by Rep. Barney Frank (D-MA), the Internet Gambling Regulation, Consumer Protection and Enforcement Act (H.R. 2267), would resolve this trade dispute by regulating Internet gambling and creating a level playing field among domestic and foreign Internet gambling operators.

The legislation also mandates a number of significant consumer protections including safeguards against compulsive and underage gambling, money laundering, fraud and identify theft.

According to a report filed by AP, the EU says it could seek compensation from the World Trade Organization because the 2006 ban unfairly prevents foreign Internet gambling sites from operating in the United States. But it said it would hold off launching legal action until it had the chance to negotiate a solution with President Barack Obama’s administration.

The adoption of the French Bill regarding the opening of the gaming market is likely to be postponed

June 19, 2009 2009

The French bill regarding the opening of the gambling market has been now transmitted for scrutiny to the Parliament. The commission of finance is in charge of preparing the Deputies’ work. At this stage, it is likely that the parliamentarian debates and vote finally end by September 2009. The final implementation of the entire system (implementation regulation, distribution of licences etc) may be postponed accordingly (Mid 2010?). In the meanwhile, the European Commission has rendered its detailed opinion extending the still-stand period for one more month. During this period the French Government is supposed to justify the restrictions to the freedom to provide services as criticized by the European Commission.

On Thursday 5th of March 2009, Eric Woerth, the Budget Minister presented the draft bill concerning the opening of the remote gambling market in France.

On 25th of March 2009 the draft bill elaborated by the government was submitted to the Council of Ministers. Following to the Council of Ministers’ approval, the text was notified to the European Commission, launching the 3 months stand-by period in application of EU Directive 98/34 in the field of gambling. On the same day too, government draft bill was sent for discussion to the National Assembly. At this stage of the parliamentarian calendar, it is likely that the Parliament will resume the procedures of scrutiny, discussions and votes by the September.

This new gambling policy is meant to monitor the offer and the practice of gambling and to channel the demand in a system controlled by public powers in the name of public and social order.

A limited and regulated opening

The opening of the French market will be strictly monitored.

According to the article 5 of the draft bill, the opening will be limited to “online horse race betting, sport betting and games consisting of shared games which depend on skill”.

Thus, lotteries, virtual slot machines, “spread betting”, “betting exchange”, betting on virtual competition and casino games in which consumers play against the bank (roulette, blackjack, etc…) are excluded from the opening.

The creation of an Online Games Regulations Authority

An Online Games Regulations Authority (Autorité de Régulation des jeux en ligne: “the ARJEL”) will be specially created to take in charge the whole gambling policy and the promotion of reasonable game.

This authority will be in charge of:

* Monitoring compliance with the objectives of games’ policy accessible through internet;
* Proposing a cahier des charges (list of requirements established by the ARJEL) to the government for each type of licence (see below);
* Preparing the licence request files for online gaming operators and attributing the licences;
* Auditing for compliance by operators with legislative and regulatory measures and clauses of the reference terms of which they are subject to.

Carrying out surveillance of online operations and participating in the fight against illegal game sites and against fraud;
* Enacting rules regarding the audit of technical and financial data for each online game or bet;
* Determining where appropriate, the technical parameters of online games within the framework of rules set by the decrees;
* Proposing legislative and regulatory modifications to the government.

Once the bill is enacted, the ARJEL will need another few months to be efficient and begin to grant licenses. For the times being, the competent authority has unofficially been appointed and started his mission.

Operators have to comply with strict conditions to get a license

The license will only be granted to online operators complying with the regulations contained in the cahier des charges (specifications).

It sets general requirements for all operators and specific clauses according to each type of licenses, namely sports betting, horse race betting or circle games (such as poker or baccarat).

For instance, all operators will be required to provide information and guarantees concerning their identification, their experience in the gambling industry, the measures they will implement to fight against player’s addiction and prevent minors from playing (see below).

Licenses will only be offered to operators established in a Member State of the European Union or the European Economic Community.

Operators will have to operate from an internet website accessible through a first level domain name with an “.fr” ending.

All data related to gambling activities, exchanged between players and operators and linked to the identification of gaming or betting events, must be available on a mirror server based in France and eventually provided through an operator representative in France.

The licence will be issued for a period of five years. It is renewable. It is not transferable. A specific agreement will be requested for each type of games operated by the licensee.

The draft bill establishes tax rates:

The tax rate will be calculated on the amount of the wagers: the total sums outlaid by players and punters. The winnings, invested by the latter in the form of new bets, will be equally taxed. The taxation amounts 8, 5% for sports betting, 15, 5% for horse racing betting, 2% for online poker.

The establishment of measures against addiction concerning consumers and minors’ protection:

In a preventive way, operators will have to insert apparent objective messages on the website about the interdiction to play for minors and the risks related to gambling activities.

Article 3 of the draft bill forbids to minors to play for money online.

The draft bill confers important obligations to gaming operators in the fight against addiction.

Articles 20 and 21 of the draft bill indicate that gaming operators have to control the age of the players at the time of the opening of the account.

Also, they have to check that the identity of the players corresponds to that of the holder of the bank card used on the site.

Finally, online service information to players will have to be set up.

To conclude, the government draft bill allows the ARJEL and the government to keep a substantial control over the gaming operators and operations. Considering the concern expressed by the Government regarding consumers’ protection, this text appears to put in place a reasonable system.

Draft bill compatibility with EU law

Additionally, it is noteworthy to underline that the European Commission rendered a detailed opinion regarding the French draft bill.

A detailed opinion attempts to prevent Members States from adopting a text, which contains barriers to the internal market, or to urge them to remove the restrictive provisions, thereby avoiding unnecessary legislative work and future EU infringement proceedings. Once a detailed opinion had been issued, the standstill period, during which the draft text must not be adopted, is extended by one month. If, after this time, the draft text is adopted without modification, the Commission can immediately commence an infringement procedure against the Member State’s newly adopted legislation.

Accordingly, the French Government can modify its draft bill by the 8 July or decide to ignore the EC recommendations and takes the risks of the launching of an infringement procedure.

Interestingly the European Commission questioned the French Government regarding the following issues:

* to which extend does the draft law putting in place a licensing regime in France take into consideration the licensing criteria set up by the other Member states for granting their license?;
* To which extend the limitation of the player return rate does effectively contributes to the fight against addiction?;
* To which extend the fiscal representative is necessary as it rather constitutes a barrier to freedom of establishment and of provision of services?;
* To which extend can the right granted to the sports events organizations be justified?

As a result, such a detailed opinion may postpone the true discussion at the Parliament. It is already unofficially evoked that the opening of the market could be postponed to June 2010.

Colloque “Jeux de hasard et d’argent : nouvelle donne, nouvelle politique ?”

June 2, 2009 News & Reports

Ce colloque s’est tenu le 11 mai au Sénat sous l’initiative du Sénateur Nicolas About et du Ministre du Budget Eric Woerth. Thibault Verbiest (caninet ULYS) a participé à la première table ronde sur la montée en puissance des jeux en ligne.

Voici le sommaire des actes du colloque qui se trouvent en annexe (pdf) … Continue Reading

Interview with John Eriksson, Widman & Hannes Snellman Ab – Assessing proposed changes in Finland

May 18, 2009 2009

In January this year, the Finnish state prosecutor – Christer Lundström – gave his decision during the pre-investigation phase against PAF and its representatives.

The Finnish state prosecutor deemed PAF’s Internet gaming operations illegal but decided not to prosecute and waived the charges.

According to the State prosecutor, PAF’s activities were illegal due to the fact that PAF’s gaming site had been translated into Finnish and acknowledged that PAF, in different ways, targeted the Finnish market.

One of the signals that state prosecutors gives to the Finnish gaming market, by waiving the charges against PAF and its representatives, is that the Finnish authorities are waiting for the proposed changes of the Lotteries Act to come into force, says John Eriksson, an associate lawyer at the law firm Widman & Hannes Snellman Ab.

Of late, Finland has been in news for debating a countrywide ban on gambling marketing.

In order to know more, Bulletbusiness.com spoke to Eriksson about the current issues. Excerpts:

Could you summarise major developments in your jurisdiction of late as far as online gambling is concerned? How do you foresee online gambling sector opening up?

Considering the recent media occurrences in Finland , it can be concluded that companies in the Finnish media sector believe that – after the proposed amendments of the Finnish Lotteries Act come into force – all advertisement of gaming services has to stop and all foreign newspapers and magazines which include advertisement of gaming services can no longer be sold in Finland.

MTV Oy – one of the biggest multi-media/TV groups in Finland – has already cancelled advertising and other cooperation agreements with gaming providers.

With regard to the pending proposed changes of the Finnish Lotteries Act and the new government report, containing proposals for further strengthening of the gaming monopoly in Finland, it can be concluded that the Finnish gaming system will not open up in the near future.

Can you provide an insight into the proposed changes under the Finnish Lotteries Act and how would this strengthen the Finnish state controlled gaming monopoly and at the same would result in further restrictions of the free movement of services within the Community?

By expanding the definition of marketing in section 4 of the proposed Lotteries Act to include “indirect advertising” and other marketing measures, the Government is also expanding the prohibition in section 62 of the Lotteries Act against marketing and organising gaming services without a licence. These proposed changes also apply on marketing and organising online gaming services.

By also introducing stricter penalties for lottery offences, the Finnish authorities create a more effective system for keeping online gaming operators outside the Finnish market.

Therefore, the proposed changes of the Lotteries Act strengthen the Finnish state controlled gaming monopoly and results in further restrictions of the free movement of services within the Community.

Considering the motives given in the proposition and the fact that the definition of marketing has been expanded, one can make the assumption that the amendment of the prohibition in section 62 of the Lotteries Act will result in that the Finnish authorities – after the proposed changes come into force – will take further actions against media and gaming providers that advertise and/or organise gaming services without a licence for the Finnish market.

It has been stated that one of the reasons behind why the state prosecutor gave his decision in January 2009 was that the Finnish Office of the Chancellor of Justice gave him an ultimatum to end the pre-investigations, which had been pending for two years, before February 2009. How do you expect the stance of the authorities as far as creation of a level playing field for all private players including both within Finland and outside Finland is concerned?

At the moment, there are no plans in Finland to allow any gaming operators established outside Finland to provide any gaming services in the Finnish market.

But after the proposed changes come into force, it will still be legal for any Finnish citizen to play gaming services provided by gaming operators established outside Finland.

You have mentioned that despite the proposed prohibition against marketing of games connected with special risks for gambling problems, such as casino games, the Government gambling associations may continue to expose their brands and addresses to their Internet gambling sites, for instance by offering sponsorship, even after the changes come into force. This demonstrates the inconsistency of the Finnish gambling regulation. Can you expand on the current situation as far as advertising and promotion of online gambling brands in Finland is concerned?

Until now, many online gaming providers advertised their services in Finnish TV-channels aired outside Finland. But due to the proposed changes of the Lotteries Act many multi-media/TV groups in Finland have cancelled advertising and other cooperation agreements with gaming providers.

However, the Government gaming associations in Finland still conduct extensive and aggressive marketing measures of their gambling services yearly. Even though Veikkaus Oy has been criticised by the Commission, the company keeps strengthening its brand by sponsoring and advertising at sales points and sports venues etc.

How has European Commission’s responded to the proposed changes of the Finnish Lotteries Act? What are your expectations going forward?

Hopefully, the European Commission will follow up the submission of comments regarding the proposed changes of the Finnish Lotteries Act – submitted to the Finnish Government on 2 February 2009 – with a reasoned opinion.

Jeu vidéo : quelle place pour la France et l’Europe dans une compétition mondialisée ?

May 15, 2009 News & Reports

Le jeu vidéo exerce un tel pouvoir de fascination qu’il est à la fois chargé de tous les espoirs et de tous les maux. Tous les espoirs quand cette industrie à la fois culturelle et de haute technologie, affiche une croissance insolente et promet de vastes débouchés, non seulement dans le domaine du loisir mais encore dans ceux de l’éducation ou de la santé. Tous les maux, quand le jeu vidéo cristallise le mal être, notamment de certains jeunes, à la recherche de repères et d’un monde qu’ils voudraient plus rassurant. Quand ses grands acteurs délocalisent leur production vers le pays le mieux disant en termes de fiscalité et de contraintes sociales et légales. Ange ou démon, nouvelle bulle ou nouvel éco-système, le jeu vidéo est un secteur industriel aux multiples facettes dont on pressent qu’il jouera un rôle clé, non seulement dans l’économie du XXIème siècle mais dans de nombreux domaines qui vont bien au-delà des loisirs. Ce nouveau rendez-vous, le troisième du genre, a l’ambition de faire le point sur ces questions et de contribuer à la mise en oeuvre d’une politique industrielle pertinente et d’un cadre juridique adapté pour que la France et l’Europe gardent une place de premier plan dans ce secteur devenu, à bien des égards, stratégique. … Continue Reading

Legal Gaming in Europe Summit 2013 – Summary Day 1

Legal Gaming in Europe Summit 2013 Day 1 Summary Video







Video: International Gaming Law Summit 2011 Highlights

International Gaming Law Summit 2011 Highlights Video



Copyright: http://www.calvinayre.com

To get the latest news follow us on

twitterlinkedintwitterlinkedin

Archives